The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Life-stage simulation analysis: Estimating vital-rate effects on population growth for conservation.
Abstract
We developed a simulation method, known as life-stage simulation analysis (LSA) to measure potential effects of uncertainty and variation in vital rates on population growth (λ) for purposes of species conservation planning. Under LSA, we specify plausible or hypothesized levels of uncertainty, variation, and covariation in vital rates for a given population. We use these data under resampling simulations to establish random combinations of vital rates for a large number of matrix replicates and finally summarize results from the matrix replicates to estimate potential effects of each vital rate on λ in a probability-based context. Estimates of potential effects are based on a variety of summary statistics, such as frequency of replicates having the same vital rate of highest elasticity, difference in elasticity values calculated under simulated conditions vs. elasticities calculated using mean invariant vital rates, percentage of replicates having positive population growth, and variation in λ explained by variation in each vital rate. To illustrate, we applied LSA to vital rates for two vertebrates: desert tortoise (Gopherus agassizii) and Greater Prairie Chicken (Tympanuchus cupido). Results for the prairie chicken indicated that a single vital rate consistently had greatest effect on population growth. Results for desert tortoise, however, suggested that a variety of life stages could have strong effects on population growth. Additional simulations for the Greater Prairie Chicken under a hypothetical conservation plan also demonstrated that a variety of vital rates could be manipulated to achieve desired population growth. To improve the reliability of inference, we recommend that potential effects of vital rates on λ be evaluated using a probability-based approach like LSA. LSA is an important complement to other methods that evaluate vital-rate effects on λ, including classical elasticity analysis, retrospective methods of variance decomposition, and simulation of the effects of environmental stochasticity.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Sensitivity analyses were conducted using Monte Carlo methods to assess relative effects of different parameter values on model output.
“Sensitivity analyses were conducted using Monte Carlo methods to assess the relative effects of different parameter values on model output [29,32].”
From Gray Wolves as Climate Change Buffers in Yellowstone (2005) · cites this paper as [32]
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 49 · Cited by 355
Metadata
- Authors
- Wisdom, M. J., Mills, L. S., & Doak, D. F.
- Affiliations
- University of Idaho (US)
- University of Montana (US)
- University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wisdom, Michael J.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-03
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 628-641
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1994636483
- Cited by
- 355
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 16.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Ecology (publishedVersion)
- The Mathematics Enthusiast (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- U.S. Forest Service
- Division of Environmental Biology
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
- Keywords
- vital rates, population growth rate, elasticity analysis, conservation planning, desert tortoise, Gopherus agassizii, greater prairie-chicken, Tympanuchus cupido, life tables
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review